donateplease
newsletter
newsletter
rishta online logo
rosemine
Bazme Adab
Google   Site  
Bookmark and Share 
design_poetry
Share on Facebook
 
Ayesha Siddiqa
Journalist
--: Biography of Ayesha Siddiqa :--

 

Dr. Ayesha Siddiqa   (b. April 7, 1966) is a civilian military scientist and political commentator from Pakistan. She is also a regular op-ed contributor to Dawn News Papers, and before that to Daily Times. Her articles appear every Friday. She previously served as professor of Military Science at the John Hopkins University.

Dr. Ayesha Siddiqa Agha did her doctorate from King's College London in 1996 and has worked on issues varying from military technology, defense decision-making, nuclear deterrence, arms procurement, arms production to civil-military relations in South asia.

Dr Siddiqa has been a civil servant for 11 years during which she was asked to work as the Director of Naval Research with Pakistan Navy making her the first civilian and a woman to work at that position in Pakistans defense establishment. She also worked as a Deputy Director in audit Defence Services Lahore Cantt. 

She was the 'Pakistan Scholar' at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars at Washington, DC for 2004-05.

Dr. Siddiqa is also an author, and her books include, Pakistan's Arms Procurement and Military Buildup, 1979-99: In Search of a Policy(Palgrave Press, 2001). Her recent book, Military Inc.: Inside Pakistan's Military Economy,  was released in April 2007.

On June 13, 2007, during her latest book launch at International Institute for Strategic Studies in London, Siddiqa said that she is not a politician and hers is an academic piece of work. She went on to add that she used Pakistan as a case study. She believes that this book is not a political thriller, rather it carries a broader issue of civil-military relationship in Pakistan. She is a visiting scholar at the Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies (South Asia Studies Program), teaching Pakistan's political economy and the history of Pakistan.

  Quotes

1.Response to the announcement by Pakistan's army high command that it is to cut 50,000 troops:

"It will only reduce the personal staff of army officers and the money saved from these cuts will probably be spent on more weaponsSo in effect I do not consider these changes as major strategic move"

2.Response when asked about Pakistans commitment to stop helping Kashmiri militants:

"I question whether there is an intent to completely disband them, because how else do you talk to India?"

Ayesha Siddiqa is an independent social scientist with expertise in civil-military relations and political-economy. She has a doctorate in War Studies from King's College, London. She has has authored two books on the military and Pakistani politics. Her book ‘Military Inc.’ was banned under the Musharraf dictatorship. She was the first Pakistan fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and a Ford Fellow. These days she is writing a regular column for the Express Tribune. In an interview with Viewpoint, she discusses Jihadification of Pakistan Television and Lollywood. Read on:

In the 1980s and the 1990s, the PTV aired plays like Sunahary Din, Alfa Bravo Charlie, Nishan-e-Haider series etc that glorified the Pakistan Army. If PTV being state-owned institution was bound to glorify the army in the 1980s when there was a military dictatorship, why the trend continued in the 1990s when there were elected governments running the country?

Military's domination of the society does not end with the end of direct military rule. In Pakistan's case the military represents one of the two key poles of power politics. Continued domination in power politics, in turn, is linked with control of the society which depends on intellectual control. These plays are one of the many ways employed by the army to maintain its control over the society. In fact, this is one of the many methods for exercising military hegemony as defined by Antonio Gramsci. Intellectual control helps dominate or shape the national discourse. On the one hand the military weakens political forces, and, on the other, it trains the youth and the general public to accept military as a credible social and political force.

Alongside the plays glorifying Pakistan Army, the PTV serials like Akhari Chattan, Shaheen, Tareekh o Tamseel which glorified Muslim past or Panah 1 and Panah II that depicted Afghan ‘resistance’ against Soviet intervention in Afghanistan, were a permanent PTV feature in the 1980s. Do you think this Jihadification of the PTV drama contributed to a militaristic culture in the country? If yes, how?

These plays are amongst the various methods adopted to make the society conservative. I would argue that the conservatising of the society is a cyclic process. The injection of conservatism for strategic reasons during the 1980s set a cycle in which people's minds were influenced. The generation that came about then was not capable of producing anything else than the plays and films you mentioned. Furthermore, conservatising the society was a major need of the security establishment to produce jihadis needed to fight at various sectors.

In the 1990s, Kashmir became a popular theme. When Mohasra, Wasal, Angar Wadi, Muqadma-e-Kashmir and host of such plays were telecast, militant outfits like Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, HizbulMujahideen (HM) etc were busy recruiting youth for ‘Jihad-e-Kashmir’. Do you think these PTV plays played a role in boasting the recruitment drive for what was called ‘Jihad-e-Kashmir’.

These plays did play a role in impressing the society and creating space for the jihad in Kashmir.

Films like Khak-our-Khoon (based on Naseem Hijazi’s novel), Ghazi IlmudDin, International Gorillay (themed on Salman Rushdie affair) etc were also produced in the 1980s. What explains the Jihadi bent of Lollywood in the 1980s since film industry was not bound to listen to the authorities unlike the PTV. Was there a market for such films that offered the producers of such films an opportunity to make money. Or if producers of these films were ideologically motivated?

Lollywood is no different from the rest of the society. There has been an increasing radicalization of the society which is reflected in the cinema as well. Lollywood is more influenced because of the socioeconomic class. The lower-middle and middle classes reflect a bias for the Islamiscts. This is the kind of people who are involved with Lollywood. Not to forget the viewers who are more inclined to see folms eulogizing jihad and jihadis.

Source : Wikipedia 

 
You are Visitor Number : 2767